Worried about the CW

All-

I'm a little worried about some of the conventional wisdom heading into the General Election. Here are the things we need to push against, because if they become Conventional Wisdom, they will damage the Obama brand.

1. Obama is 100% Liberal.

If you look at the McCain strategy briefing, you'll see that voters identify McCain all across the spectrum, but a majority think Obama is "liberal" as opposed to moderate. More than that, the CW that McCain is trying to push is that Obama toes the party line all the time; I heard the word "robotic" used on the Sunday shows today.

We need to counter this by referencing the middle class tax cut, his desire to expand the military, and his choice for an gov't optional healthcare plan.

2. Obama will raise your taxes

Especially in a time of economic crunch, people don't like to hear that a candidate wants to raise their taxes. The three main components to this are lifting the ceiling on Social Security taxes, letting the Bush tax cuts expire, and raising the Capital Gains tax. Someone (not me) needs to go though and find out wwhich income brackets are better or worse off when the first two happen, in conjunction with the middle class tax cut. We need to be able to tell people that under Obama, their taxes would go down.

3. Obama has no real accomplishments.

Coburn-Obama (Gov't transparency), Lugar-Obama (Nuclear De-proliferation), and the Ethics reform were his highlights in the US Senate. The best example from Chicago is his death penalty reform work, where he brought the police unions behind his reforms.

4. Obama doesn't have specific plans.

Sadly, voters don't typically go for 10 point plans, but some think (and some push) the idea that Obama isn't offering any specifics. When you hear this, you can tell them about Obama's 62 page "Blueprint for Change" posted on his website. If people want to go see his policies, they can, but the number "62" should be important in countering this idea.

5. Obama doesn't have experience.

Said Obama at one town call: "When people ask if you have experience, what they're really asking is 'Does he have good judgement?'"

The 2002 war speech is our best ally here. If we keep Obama from being defined in these ways, then we will have taken some of our opponents' favorite weapons.

The power is yours.



Display:


Re: Worried about the CW (none / 0)

Great diary.

Regarding #2 - I think the greater point is about the fairness of the tax system. Obama wants to make the system more fair - which would result in lower taxes, at least proportionately, for the vast, vast majority of Americans. I think this is something that most people will appreciate.

Regarding #4 -  I think it is up to Obama and his campaign to generate a response to these claims. He needs a sound-bite worthy plan he can repeat ad nauseum to the cameras for a couple months. Maybe even something as simple as a 100-days plan or a "top 3" list.


www.thingsyoungerthanmccain.com
by LandStander on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 10:30:50 PM EST

Re: Worried about the CW (none / 0)

With you on #4 - his Tuesday speech did have quite a few specifics - we'll have to see what he does in this "economic tour."


by Falsehood on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 11:49:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

# 1 is going to be hard to counter (none / 0)

because Obama does have the most liberal voting record in the Senate bar none, but I'm not sure it really matters this election.


by phoenixdreamz on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 10:35:14 PM EST

Re: # 1 is going to be hard to counter (2.00 / 1)

You have bought into a definition parsed from selective votes prompted by the National Journal. You don't supposed they are biased, do you?

Beside as JFK so masterly stated, what is wrong with liberal? Heck, its used to be the name of the party in NY.

But if by a "Liberal" they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people -- their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties -- someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a "Liberal," then I'm proud to say I'm a "Liberal."

JFK's Acceptance Speech
New York Liberal Party Nomination
September 14, 1960


by ttmiskovsky on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 11:20:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: # 1 is going to be hard to counter (none / 0)

I'm glad that you're glad to be a liberal. Obama has the most liberal voting record of anyone in the Senate. You need to start acting like you're proud of that, because your reply reeks of being a contradiction in terms seeking to have things both ways. If you didn't convince me, you'll never convince a Republican.


by phoenixdreamz on Mon Jun 09, 2008 at 07:28:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Worried about the CW (2.00 / 2)

#1 - It'll be a two-pronged campaign. First, like you talk about, Obama's not 100% liberal. Second, being liberal isn't a bad thing. More people would identify with liberals if the word liberal wasn't synonymous with "idealistic hippie". Liberals: fix health care, end the war, help the helpless. That's supposed to be a bad thing?

#2 - He wants to repeal the Richie Rich tax cuts to help everyone. It's an easy case to make.

#3 - Great point.

#4 - Some of that was because of the nature of the primary, but he's got plenty of specifics on his website. He does need to hone his message to a few specific points that people can talk about.

#5 - McCain had experience. He had insight. He had everything... And he chose wrong. Repeatedly. Experience only matters if you learn from it, and he hasn't.


by TCQuad on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 10:36:22 PM EST

Re: Worried about the CW (2.00 / 2)

but a majority think Obama is "liberal" as opposed to moderate.

- He is a liberal.  


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 10:38:04 PM EST

Re: Worried about the CW (none / 0)

Let's see:
1. Obama is perceived as being far left due to the fact that he came out of the south side of Chicago and his associations. There's really nothing he can do about that.

2. Well they say that about every D. Ignore.

3. This is a serious problem. Obama really doesn't have many accomplishments. I understand he had basically done nothing for the first six years in the Il senate. He hasn't been in the US senate long enough to really accomplish anything. There's nothing he can do about this either.

4. The reason people believe that he doesn't have specific plans is because he doesn't talk about his plans. And don't tell people to go to his website. That's a really dumb mistake that Kerry constantly made. People think you are too lazy to tell them your stances when you say that.

5. Obama doesn't have experience. He is the least qualified candidate to run for the presidency in probably 100 years or more.


No longer a Democrat, now proudly an independent voter!
by Ga6thDem on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 10:43:27 PM EST

Re: Worried about the CW (2.00 / 1)

5 McCain points for you!!! 995 more and you get an official McCain polyp!


John McCain wants to stay in Iraq.
by ihaveseenenough on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 11:26:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Worried about the CW (2.00 / 2)

You have some legit points, undercut by blatant spin.


by Falsehood on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 11:47:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Worried about the CW (2.00 / 1)

#1: I think it's also important to point out that, since his term in the office has been Bush's second as President, he's been taking stances against some disastrous policies of the Bush administration.  

In other words, if you look at voting records the since January 2005, I bet a LOT of Democrats seem like uber-liberals.  But you can't go wrong selling his time in the Senate as being opposed to Bush's policies (and, thus, McCain as being for them).  Because of Bush, who threatens to veto anything Democrats might want to pass, Obama has had fewer chances to truly craft the sort of bi-partisan approach that he has talked about in his campaign, but (and this is important if you're talking to independents/moderates) he's signaling his willingness, as President, to NOT have such a close minded administration.  

There isn't a single issue where you can't effectively contrast what Obama wants to do with what Bush has done and McCain very well might do.


No way. No how. No McCain.
by freedom78 on Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 10:50:46 PM EST

Re: Worried (none / 0)

#5 is a loser for him in the general election.

It reminds voters that four years ago, he wasn't even IN the U.S. Senate (therefore it is easy for him to talk about the Iraq war resolution as he had no RESPONSIBILITY for voting either for or against it). (He would have voted "present" even if he had been there).

So he was right once. So what? France was right too. That doesn't make him any more "prescient" than Hillary or any other Democrat who voted yes in the Senate.


by WolfmanJack on Mon Jun 09, 2008 at 11:55:25 AM EST

Re: Worried (none / 0)

I'm sure making fun of McCain's age is going to be very helpful with age 65+ voters

Who are much more reliable voters than Obama's college-kid base.


by WolfmanJack on Mon Jun 09, 2008 at 11:58:14 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.